This is a news submission from a reader like you. We consider all submissions.

On Friday, the Supreme Court agreed to hear two cases related to the 2016 election that could potentially have far-reaching effects on the Electoral College and future elections. The two cases are Colorado Department of State v. Baca and Chiafalo v. Washington.  

Sick of Ads? Become a Premium Subscriber!

In the 2016 election, there were ten faithless electors – the most in the modern era. In Washington, three electors (Peter Chiafalo, Levi Guerra, and Esther John) were elected to vote for Hillary Clinton but voted for former Secretary of State Colin Powell instead. This led to a fine of $1,000 per state law. They are challenging that law as unconstitutional on First Amendment grounds.  

In Colorado, Michael Baca was elected as an elector for Hillary Clinton and attempted to vote for the former Governor of Ohio and Republican candidate John Kasich instead. State law removed him from the college and replaced his vote. He is challenging that law as unconstitutional on Twelfth Amendment grounds. 

Sick of Ads? Become a Premium Subscriber!

These two cases have been consolidated into a single case and the Supreme Court has granted 1 hour of argument later in the term. Depending on how the Justices rule, this could change the frequency and power of faithless electors.  

The Liberty Hawk is Now on Medium

Betraying Allies Is Not the Way to Avoid Being the World’s Police

The Last Full Measure of Devotion

The Value of Dissent

“All or Nothing”

Shall We Play a Game?

The Progress of Leviathan

The Persistence of Mad Kings in Literature and History

Is Trump Running As Both Bush And Dukakis?

The Crazy Uncle Election

Case Studies in Reanimation

Link: Does the Constitution Hang by a Thread?

COVID Stimulus – Round 4

Masks and Social-Distancing: What Would the Founders Say?

Faithless Electors are Dead, Long Live the Electoral College

Both Sides Erase History

‘Woke’ Ideology Is Damaging the Fabric of Society

Stop Tearing Down Statues and Start Building Understanding

Censorship and Amplification

Nothing Happens In A Vacuum

{"dots":"true","arrows":"true","autoplay":"true","autoplay_interval":3000,"speed":600,"loop":"true","design":"design-1"}

If the Justices rule that these laws are, in fact, unconstitutional, it would mean state governments could not penalize electors for voting however they want. This would be more in keeping with how the Electoral College was originally intended to function. 

This is an important case to watch even though it isn’t on a flashy controversial topic like abortion or executive power. 

Do you have a response to this article? Would you like to offer your own take on this topic? Feel free to submit your own article or offer a comment below.

Sick of Ads? Become a Premium Subscriber!

Thaddeus R. Winker is a father and husband living in the Midwest and a frequent contributor to The Liberty Hawk. By day he works as a software developer but in a past life, he earned an MA in Biblical Studies at the Catholic University of America in Washington, DC and a BA in Classics from Xavier University in Cincinnati, OH. He enjoys fantasy, science fiction, and spending time with his family. You can follow him on twitter @Thadypus.

Latest posts by Thaddeus R. Winker (see all)
Sick of Ads? Become a Premium Subscriber!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *